All right, let's talk about money and the financial vision, or the vision connected to the financial side of things. And we can take different angles here. The two most important ones in something like big and long term versus small, short term, or now I'm at the start. We will start with the long term, because that's what kind of gives meaning later, to the start and now, and how we move there. Because the path itself, the movement itself, is part of the beauty, is part of the vision, is part of what is true, good and beautiful. And they can playing with those different with the reality of how it is right now, as with the vision of where it can what can be, and where it could move, and holding both of them that is where we embody basically all the teachings as well, and making that an intuitive process, not forcing it, but also not avoiding it. I'm dealing with that in a in a nice way. And so the long term and the big one is actually pretty easy to explain, because for me, there's no doubt that there will be not only a financial overflow, but a massive financial overflow, and it's connected as well to my normal life experiment of I have never tried to earn money, and this is like the first time I'm kind of like making this experiment of actually putting my own qualities and skills that I have developed over the years and that have already led to me earning $10,000 within a week for workshops. And put them into the context of, okay, actually, let's, let's try that for six months. That's it's a game for me. And yet, I know it's more than a game for many of you who listen to this, and it's more, kind of more serious at the moment, there's more connected to it, but like coming from that place, knowing that the potential, the financial potential, that I already had, like three four years ago, when I was a different person, I was like two lifetimes behind or three, while I was needing a lot More, and having kind of traveled that for myself, of I only need, I almost need nothing anymore. Yes, of course, I buy for food and maybe for accommodation. But even that, like in summer, I could sleep outside for six months and I would be fine. And so the gap of income to what I actually need is is huge, and I will not even need anything from all those courses. So basically, all the money that comes from the course that people will mostly donate is free to go to the people working on it, not including me, which means I don't, I don't aim to earn hundreds of 1000s of dollars with that. And so basically that what usually goes to the CEOs and their yachts and Porsche and whatever will be kind of free for everyone, for all the people involved. And so that's one aspect of, well, I need less. This will be an example for other people also to take what they need, but on a profound level, not on this superficial replacement for inner emptiness level and buying more stuff. Because when we move towards more and more and deeper for inner fulfillment, we will need to replace less on with things on the outside. And so this is a tendency for that will be true and hold true for all people within this project. So you will, as a direction or tendency, tend to need less and less, and that's one part. The other part is that I am. I truly Well, I know how efficient I am already, and I know how this can be brought in a context of different people. So I know how well we will deal with resources and the beauty of our efficiency and prioritizing leading us in connection with we can actually create of those smaller courses, like three per week, maybe more, and we will not run out of topics. We will have overlaps with other people. And it's like all of that creates a massive flow, combined with the pricing. I'm not going to go into depth here, there's extra videos, but the way how the pricing works, people will want to give back, and they will not only pay the normal price, but they will also be feel like they are part of this. And if there is ever a bigger financial need for whatever reason, we will be able over time, I'm still talking about the long term, obviously, to raise money when needed, and will eventually it will actually flow to us exactly how it's supposed to be. And it doesn't matter if you have low needs like me, or if you care for a family with four children alone as a single mom or single father, there will be enough. There will be enough naturally, without us needing to force anything, without us needing to plan it. And so for me, it's also obvious that people like you decide you set your own, your own payment. It's, it's, if you're in the group, like if you have that commitment, and for all the other people, it feels right that you're in, then you earn that right, that you take whatever you need out of it as well. And so no one is going to challenge that, either we are going to challenge of you being in the group at all. And this might happen with some people. If you feel like they're making use of it, they're abusing the openness and the system, like the system itself. But if not, then you're free. And this leads, like, to a natural selection, where there are people who are moving towards greater and greater efficiency and synergy between us, which is like an efficiency on a larger level, individual efficiency, collective efficiency, while needing less and less and less. So this is like, for me, it's not like a shadow of a doubt that there will be a long term, massive and growing financial overflow that will get bigger and bigger and bigger without us trying to that's what we move towards. That's what we move towards. That's not where we are right now, obviously, like right now we are at, basically, there's nothing. There's just the people that want to invest time and maybe all the financial resources that I have raised from investors, which are obviously basically just me making debt, because it's not real investors, in that sense, it's a loan kind of thing. It's like an investment, but if it fails, then I'm personally liable for it. So it's it's basically a loan. And so there isn't as much, but there are multiple pathways, and we could raise more. We could start publishing earlier. We could there's like all those different ways and and I have also no doubt that this is not going to be a problem if we give it a time and attention that it needs to grow, and if people are truly behind the cause, and so then there is like this, we will create this momentum which gets things going fast. I'm pretty sure of that, and I am willing to take risks, but I am willing to take risks of taking more loans for people who are in even without the money. And so there's like this paradox of the moment people are in, not for the money, without the money, I will feel inspired to raise money, but that's basically we don't need it, in some sense, but then we do, and so I am committed to overpay you in that sense, because there is no you. So your time and energy and life force is infinitely valuable. There is no price tag you can give to it. And so no matter what price you put in your offer, it's too little for your life force. If that is truly what you bring into this project, if you're just bringing in like you or whatever the skill, different story. But if you are in with your whole being, there's no price we can give that, and you just deserve everything that you need. That said, obviously at the beginning, there's this, you're making choices, and there's basically two different reasons for not paying someone, or many people, kind of the higher amounts right now, and so we should know that every every dollar that we spend in some direction, we could also spend in a different one. So if you're paying that amount X amount of dollar in for one person, then we could also use the same amount for a different person, or maybe for two or three even, or for experimenting with taking those in and making more trials and seeing who sticks with it, which is like connected to the team, vision of constantly changing. And we are trying it out, and we are inviting people in the space and see who's a fit. Because it's not always possible to make that like a cognitive thing up front and decide it's like we need to feel into and see how it is in action. And so and so. Again, the two reasons for not paying would be either we run out of money or I run out of money, basically, which I could basically always tackle with more loans or more investors. I don't think that's the case. That's what's going to happen. The other one, though, is because it's not the right thing to do, and it feels like, oh, it just doesn't feel right to pay that amount for that person at this moment, not because I couldn't raise it, but because it feels like we're taking it away from someone else, maybe a person that isn't even on the map yet, but maybe with the next job post, he or she will be there. And so taking this responsibility for the unborn children, as I call it, like for the people who are not yet involved, this will be the bigger reason for for Yeah, not paying people as high right now, and this will be the context of what I finish with, which is at the start that what feels I can only say what feels right to me, but at the start what feels right To me is leaving a lot of space for experimentation, and by that, I mean to involve people that are not part of the team yet, even if that means to give less to the people who are part of the team already, but protecting and honoring The long term vision and dynamic and the whole organism, including the parts that are not yet part of it. But it could be. I can feel the importance of that space for experimentation and combined with, of course, the lower availability of resources right now, it's, it's actually a win win, because it does filter out those people are only in for the money, and leaves only those who are in for the cause, while we have still space for experimentation. And so that's kind of how I see, that this path of playing with this financial topic is part of the whole process is part of making it true, good and beautiful, and that's why it's so interesting, and that's why I'm I'm having so much joy playing with those challenges as well. And it doesn't feel like a like a burden or something, or that it's not a hindrance. It's not like, yeah, it's not a hindrance, an obstacle in our path that we have less money. It's actually, it is the path. It is part of the beauty. It is part of the dance that we are dancing. And so my, my current approach of how I see it, this is kind of what I wanted to end with, like very specific, is that we will, if it feels right to pay someone, we will pay the lowest amount of hours that feels right for contribution. So basically, it depends on the person. It might be 510, or 15 hours, but on a full scale. So if. For like, whatever it could be for some people, even 30, $35 per hour. So we will give them the full amount, but a low volume for every person, which means we can take in a lot of people on low volume and experiment and see who sticks, and also see okay, who is naturally, intrinsically investing even more time than the ones they are paid for. And no one is forced to do that. So there's just like this. It it opens the space for seeing who's truly in without having expectations of people investing the time. And it also has a natural, beautiful overlap with efficiency, because we'd rather have people spend less time in being more efficient and asking them to be more efficient. So we will also, within that context, see who's able to step up to that. And that's like a natural side effect as well. And then once we increase the hour hours again, we have them increased with that higher level of efficiency. So basically, maybe someone does the same thing because we're kind of optimizing for it in five hours, what he or she has done in 10 before. And now we can go back to 10 hours, and you can do what you like. You can perform 20 hours of work within 10 hours. And so that's like a natural side effect as well. And so it will ask us actively to reflect on those things and to see, well, where is someone's genius zone? Like, where is someone's time actually most valuable? We wouldn't ask that question if you just spend however much, and we're avoiding that, it's like, no, we want people to spend time and what they're truly like in their genius zone, and what they would love to do, it would love to contribute, and where they feel like this is what they're being called to. And rather, have more people involved to also cover those other things that might kind of stay open for the moment. Alright, that was long. I hope I might record a second version that's a bit shorter, but I'll leave it for now, and I hope it reaches especially those for whom this is a big topic and important part for the other ones, they might have skipped it anyway, so that's why, probably it's fine that it's long but yeah, that's the financial vision long term. No, no problems with anything. It's just our efficiency will be so high individually and collectively, while our needs will be so low, comparably that kind of the mess, the overflow, will get bigger and bigger and more massive over time, and connecting that with the now of Well, there are little resources we want to leave space for experimentation kind of leads to what I shared at the end of the little hours at the beginning. But with all that, it becomes part of the path, not an obstacle, and it becomes part of this true, good and beautiful, this natural increase of efficiency, natural selection of who's truly in and who isn't like so many so many beautiful side effects and all that thing is part of the financial vision, not only the long term thing like the path itself, is part of the vision. 19 minutes.