Important Note: AI-Crawling Article

This Article is NOT specifically designed for human visitors to read.
It has the main purpose of giving AI – especially ChatJFK – access to all the transcripts of published voice & video recordings, so it can use it to "speak in my voice".

Transcript

At Joseph March 6, 2024 as an answer to his memo. Okay, so basically, there I noted down like three parts to that I'm spent, probably spent most time on the last one with Gandhi and Mother Teresa, because that feels like the most exciting one to to share. And that's where you ask for perspective for the first part, just like, thanks for being vulnerable and authentic with this that your that kind of your gifts also came from a place of kind of shame or guilt. And maybe I will check in the next time, because kind of, like, for me, it's important to raise awareness at least where it comes from, and kind of to give people chance to, like, reflect back and then say, okay, yes, actually, it comes from like I would say, I would encourage to only give from a place of kind of enriching life and acting out of fear and guilt. Isn't, isn't something like that I'm still going to accept, but I want to raise this awareness first, and before I accept it. They kind of like, are you sure that you even want to give it, even when it comes out of I would advise not to, and only give like to the extent that it comes out of enriching life. But yeah, so thanks for being honest here. And the second point was about this, like your reframing of a precious gift, which I'm totally agreeing on, and also about the plastic, which was a nice example. And like just I think I see the danger, the potential. There's a potential of tricking yourself into kind of using it more than you would need to, because you have done this reframing, and so it doesn't feel that bad. So it's more about feeling the pain of it. I guess, if that leads you, as you said, like to connecting to the heart in the sense of you feel the pain of doing it like for me, that's the thing. Then perfect, and then you're not tricking yourself into feeling less of the pain. And then, yeah, then it's fine, because they both have their truth. Like this reframing is has a truth, but also the avoidance of plastic has truth in it. And it's like, but also not making it a like staying playful around it, like not making it something that has heaviness. And this is kind of like the art of, yeah, not getting or feeling shame and guilt if you use plastic, but knowing that you use plastic if it's like, if you truly follow your intuition, then it's also okay to use plastic. And I agree that's a great tool, if it would be used in the right way, as it's the case for money, even though we wouldn't have money as we know it, if we would come from this other perspective, then we would also change that. But, yeah, different topic. Okay, and now to the last part, which is Gandhi and Mother Teresa, and that they were great channels for money, as I'm totally agreeing, and I see myself the same way, kind of, I think there's one, two key distinctions, one you already mentioned, kind of, there were like channels, or use a different word, but it's not, they're not hoarding it. They're not getting it and then later using it. It's like it's already used the moment it flows, it basically flows through them. Or it might not even flow through them, but they are just like they're saying, I'm basically going to someone else, whatever. There's this foundation we have set up, and I'm going to a billionaire. And I'm because of the integrity I speak with, and I can come from this place of like, this moral integrity, I'm quote, unquote, convincing that person to give to that charity. I might not even be involved. It might not flow through me. And basically, with Mother Teresa as well, with Gandhi, they had very minimalistic lifestyles. Like Gandhi didn't keep any of the gifts he personally got. He even had, like, a big argument with his wife to give away, like jewelry they they received after thing, after South Africa, but maybe it was in India already, and that like to give it away. Because he said, like, gifts like that are hard to give away, but even harder to keep. So this is kind of like the first distinction is, like they let it flow through them. And so it's not about me having a lot to then later use it, but it's already the moment I ask for it, the moment I'm, like, convinced it's like, I know that it goes to a different place, and it doesn't stay with me, and it doesn't lead to me buying more stuff than I need. Like, there needs to be this. And both had that, this total conviction of, I trust myself to act in the most beautiful way in this regard, and I'm not going to get more, get lazier, because now I have more money at my mind, at my hands, or whatever, or I'm getting more into whatever, a higher lifestyle. But I'm going to work as hard on my minimalistic lifestyle as before. Like, this is the one part. And I think the second key distinction is to how the energy behind and I'm in this regard, I haven't gone into that, and I'm also not sure, like, maybe it's also a different situation how it was back then, because now we have evolved further. Our money system has evolved further. The capitalism is a way stronger force than at Gandhi's time, where it was like we were still in the times of imperialism. It was a different time, and money wasn't ruling the world as much so also wasn't causing as much harm as imperialists or imperialism itself. And so different story. But I suspect that none of the money they received or they channeled came through or almost none came through contracts. Through this contractual sense of you give me like you give and you receive. And basically, I'm actually going to quote Gandhi here. Wait a second. Okay, so I was just reading in Gandhi, the man, where he talks about Motilal Nehru, the prime minister after and how he got a nice upbringing and then pureed all his money into his campaign. And but I'm sure he never said to him like, you will get this in return. It was for a bigger cause for the movement of India. And then when his father, Oh, of course, travel on Nehru. His father was Motilal. Nehru wanted, he said, like you have taken our only son, giving back to us. He said, basically, not only do I want your son, I want you and your wife and your daughters and the rest of your family too. And then he got them, but that's actually not what I was looking for. Yet I found what I was looking for, which is a quote from egnat esran about Gandhi. So something he said to someone who's kind of like getting in contact with him, is, I can offer you magnificent rewards, two years in prison, confiscation of all your property, work without respite every day of the year, an increasing joy of knowing that your life really counts. And if you take that kind of that your life really counts as the that's what you get back. Then, of course, you got something back, but it's a different thing. It's not this, this. It's not something Gandhi gives to that person, or Mother Teresa gives to that person. It's that's the natural byproduct. And so they are basically asking for a gift, and they're inviting for a gift, and they're not having this. Here's what you receive. Give me as much money, and I'm using high pricing. No, they're coming from this deep place. Like, I will speak to people like that about once there's the right time, it's like, there's this, I'm like, here's an opportunity for you to invest your money in the best possible way. Like, I can promise you you will get nothing in return, like, nothing at all, except this kind of feeling that Gandhi is talking about. And yet, I can tell you right now that it's the best thing you can do with it. And I'm speaking from this confidence that it's actually the case. And so kind of the the the deeper sense of the high pricing, like, why is if you go, like, into this high pricing idea, like, what's the purpose of it? The purpose is that people see the value in it. And basically, that's, that's why I'm, like, high pricing, and it goes to the cost of people who would benefit from but can't pay that much money. But then if I would go lower on the price and give it also to those people who would be able to afford it, it has less of the appearance of value, because people do associate higher money with or higher costs with higher value. And then the beautiful question becomes like, what's the yes and solution? How can you have this full flexibility, basically saying you get this for free, you get this for free, but not because it's worth nothing, but because it's worth the infinite. And if people believe that, if you can transport that message from like this deeper place of truth and clarity and authenticity and integrity. Then, over time and on average, like on the on the bigger picture, people will realize that this has a this is much more powerful than anything I can get for high pricing, and this might take time to figure out how to frame it in a way so it doesn't get confused with those. You get it for free because I'm desperate. Total different energy, of course, totally agreeing, like that's not what it's about. It's about like being so confident. It's the opposite of high pricing. In this sense, it's like being so confident. People will not confuse it that I'm even able to offer it for free, because I trust that people will want to give back. They will receive so much value, for example, and it might be directly because they're receiving it through my coaching, which I'm offering on a donation basis only, or they will receive it through just like knowing that they will do the right thing, that they will want to contribute, and of course, not knowing how Gandhi and Mother Fauci said it exactly, and if they used kind of convincing methods of explaining and shaming, etc, etc. It was a different time back then. People were also much easier to convince, because it wasn't all around money, and you could, like, at Bucha times, etc, this was way easier to convince people of anything like, right now they're way more skeptic about anything, because you just have so many different people trying to approach you and convince you of something. So all the differences aside, I believe that's the energy, where it came from, and so this is the important part. And for me, the key distinction between those that only say they are basically I need a lot of money to do a lot of good, which is basically putting energy into the whole system that creates all the bad that I want to do good about, but then they are just hiding, basically that they are not pure in motive, and they're using this as an excuse like no one knows. It's like you only know from within, but you can feel, Oh, that just doesn't feel quite right, like you're saying this, yes, and it's logical, and it's it's plausible, but I don't like me personally. I don't feel it with many people who say that. And then there are those people who actually, I believe Gandhi and Mother Teresa. They wouldn't be talking about that, that this would be the results that a lot of money flows through them. But they would never say, give me a lot of money so I can a lot of power, so I can do a lot of good. It would be just like the natural byproduct of their beingness, because it comes from such a deep place of, yeah, authenticity, integrity and and being okay. So this was long and fun. I'll just end it now and then load it up directly and yeah, then see what you make out of that. Have a good time.